Celtics execute, steal home court advantage

The only thing that the Boston Celtics should feel badly about coming out of Cleveland after the first two games of their first-round series with the Cavaliers is that they should be up 2-0. Okay; so maybe that's not exactly a small issue, but the fact that Boston really should hold a fairly commanding 2-0 series lead instead of being even at 1-1 is very impressive for a team that was considered (by most) to be a significant underdog entering this series.

The Celtics have thoroughly out-played the Cavaliers thus far. They have led for six of total eight quarters, Rajon Rondo is absolutely torching Maurice Williams, Antawn Jamison cannot cover Kevin Garnett, Rasheed Wallace seems to have suddenly turned back the clock, Shaquille O'Neal is a non-factor, and they may have discovered a solution for containing LeBron James. And, after the 104-86 drubbing Boston delivered on Monday night, it has given Cleveland a lot to think about, and one really has to wonder where the Cavs' confidence is at the current time.

Clearly, Cleveland's main issue is Rondo; it simply cannot stop him. After going off for 27 points and 13 assists in game one, he followed up with 13 and 19 in game two, with 12 of those 19 assists coming in the first half alone. Oh, and to put into perspective exactly how dominant Rondo was through the first three quarters, he did not have a single dime during the final period. Meanwhile, his counterpart, Williams, finished 1-of-9 from the floor with four points in game two after propelling the Cavaliers to a game one victory with 20 points and a huge third quarter. Cleveland coach Mike Brown ripped into Williams after the game, essentially saying that the Cavaliers have no shot in the series if his point guard continues to play like that.

It has also become blatantly obvious that the 6'9" Jamison cannot cover the 6'13" Garnett (as Garnett refuses to call himself 7'1"). K.G. has easily been shooting over the top of Jamison throughout the first two contests, going for 18 points and 10 rebounds in both games while playing stellar defense. Garnett was feeling so confident that he actually took 21 shots in game two, and this is a guy who has been consistently criticized for not shooting enough in the past. Then you have Anthony Parker, considered to be a solid defender, who had his problems with Ray Allen in game two, as Allen ran Parker ragged by draining three three-pointers and going for 22 points, constantly moving without the ball and running Parker off of countless screens.

All of that aside, what may be most alarming about Cleveland getting taken behind the woodshed Monday night was the fact that the Cavs attempted 38 free throws as opposed to Boston's 18 (Cleveland also took more free throws in game one, attempting 10 more). Cleveland only hit 26 of those 38, good for 68.4%. The Celtics made the most of their opportunities, shooting an efficient 15-of-18 (83.3%). Oh, and another nugget: Boston, the worst rebounding team in the league this season, outrebounded the Cavaliers 43-32.

Now, if you still don't think the Celtics were conserving energy for the playoffs, then I suggest you never watch another NBA game, because you obviously do not know basketball. They have very much gotten into Cleveland's heads, and now with the series heading to TD Garden for two games, James and company could be in serious trouble.

Now that we mentioned James, let's talk about his game two performance, because it was nothing short of abysmal. Yes, he finished with a game-high 24 points and grabbed seven boards, but he had more turnovers (five) than assists (four), missed five free throws, shot 0-of-4 from three, and simply looked, for lack of a better word, lazy out on the floor. His passes were lethargic, his drives to the hoop looked tentative, and his aggressiveness was nowhere to be seen. So, either his elbow his bothering him more than he is letting on, or Boston's outstanding team defense has befuddled him. There might be a combination of the two involved, but I am more inclined to believe the latter of the two possibilities.

The Celtics are jamming up the paint whenever James makes a move to the hoop, forcing him to dish the ball out to his shooters, "shooters" that shot 4-of-21 from three-point range in game two. It's not like the Cavs have any inside scoring to offset that horrible perimeter shooting, either, as O'Neal is not even a shell of his former self (he went 4-for-10 with nine points), Jamison is being taken out of the game by Garnett, and Anderson Varejao can only score when he is wide open two feet away from the basket.

To make things even worse for Cleveland, Boston may have found a new (or, actually, old) weapon in Wallace, who tallied 17 points off 7-of-8 shooting, including 3-of-4 from beyond the arc, in 18 minutes in game two. 'Sheed resembled the player that put the Detroit Pistons over the top in 2004 and helped them make it back to the Finals in 2005. If he can keep producing like that for the remainder of the series, the Cavaliers can say good night, because they are already having enough trouble stopping the likes of Rondo, Garnett, and Allen. Oh, and Paul Pierce hasn't even really gotten going yet.

The Celtics and Cavaliers are two teams going in different directions, as Boston is playing its best basketball of the season, while Cleveland struggled with the eighth-seeded Chicago Bulls and has looked like the inferior team to Boston thus far in this series.

Once again, Boston in six.

Why the Celtics will beat the Cavaliers

For the second time in three years, the Boston Celtics and Cleveland Cavaliers will meet in the second round of the NBA Playoffs. The first time around, in 2008, Boston eliminated Cleveland in an epic seven-game series, a series in which the deciding game saw LeBron James and Paul Pierce go off for 45 and 41 points, respectively. Most die-hard NBA fans can still almost flawlessly replay the second half of that May afternoon contest at TD Garden in their minds. The Celtics would then, of course, go on to win the championship.

Flash forward two years later, and much has changed. For one, Boston does not have homecourt advantage in this series; Cleveland does. The Cavaliers' personnel also looks awfully different, as they have added the likes of Maurice Williams, Antawn Jamison, Shaquille O'Neal, and Anthony Parker to their ranks since that game seven. The Celtics' roster is very similar, but at the same time, it isn't. Their starting lineup is identical to the one it had in that 2008 battle, but Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce, and Ray Allen have all declined, with Garnett and Pierce both undergoing knee surgeries and Allen fighting a couple of pesky injuries and, of course, father time.

It isn't all sour for Boston, though, as Rajon Rondo and Kendrick Perkins have both improved more than considerably over the past two seasons, with Rondo developing into a top five point guard in the league and Perkins turning into an elite low-post defender. As far as the Celtics' bench goes, both Tony Allen and Glen Davis are much more significant contributors than they were in '08. However, Boston no longer has the likes Eddie House and P.J. Brown coming off the pine to spark the team. They do have Rasheed Wallace, Nate Robinson, and Marquis Daniels, but all three players have been significant disappointments this season, although Wallace could very well be a huge factor in this series (which I will get to later).

Outside of James, Cleveland's starting five is unrecognizable when stacked up against its '08 squad which consisted of James, Zydrunas Ilgauskas, Ben Wallace, Wally Szczerbiak, and Delonte West. This year, Ilgauskas and West are still members of the team, but they have been relegated to bench roles. The Cavaliers' starting lineup now features James, O'Neal, Jamison, Parker, and Williams. Cleveland has some very nice depth, with West, Anderson Varejao, J.J. Hickson, Jamario Moon, and Ilgauskas being prominent bench players.

Both teams won their first-round matchups in five games, the Celtics taking out fifth-seeded Miami, the Cavaliers beating eighth-seeded Chicago. I really liked the way Boston handled the Heat. Garnett and company made it overwhelmingly challenging for Miami to work the ball inside, and largely due to that, Jermaine O'Neal had a dreadful series, and Dwyane Wade was forced to take many more perimeter jumpers than he wanted.

The Celtics' "old legs" have seemingly come to life in the postseason, which was something that I had anticipated all year long. I'm not saying that Boston essentially did not care about the regular season, but given that its "Big Three" of Garnett, Pierce, and Allen are all well into their 30s and carry a ton of mileage on their bodies, it is not at all outlandish to say that the Celts were conserving energy for the playoffs. In fact, it is probably factual, especially considering how well and how live each of those future Hall-of-Famers looked against the Heat. Garnett was back to being a disruptive force on defense and on the boards, Pierce had reverted back to Boston's clear-cut go-to guy in crunchtime, and Allen had rediscovered consistency on his three-point stroke, hitting threes at a 53% clip during the first round.

Coming into the playoffs, no one was giving the Celtics a chance to do much of anything because of their age. As a matter of fact, many had Miami either taking Boston to seven games or even beating them. Hardly anyone was even discussing whether or not the Celts would stand a chance against the likes of Cleveland or Orlando in the postseason; most were just wondering how well they would handle their first-round series. Talk about jumping the gun with a team that consists of three future Hall-of-Famers (and yes; I know that is the second time I mentioned that).

What I want to know is what makes the Cavaliers such a sure-thing to beat Boston. Okay; so they have James. Well, the Celtics have Garnett, Pierce, Allen, and Rondo. You might answer back and say that Cleveland also has Shaq, to which I will respond by saying that Boston has a player who is considered by many to be the NBA's best low-post defender in Perkins. If O'Neal couldn't get much going against the Bulls, how is he going to get into any kind of rhythm against the Celtics? As far as Jamison goes, I see him having quite a bit of trouble finding his game with Garnett patrolling the paint. Jamison is a good low-post scorer, but K.G. is one of the best defenders to ever play the game, and his length could and should give him a lot of problems.

Boston will surely employ a similar strategy against Cleveland as they did against Miami, which is to vehemently defend pick-and-rolls involving James and stack the defense against him whenever he attempts to penetrate off of those screens. The Celtics used this tactic against Wade, and although Wade averaged over 30 PPG for the series, it worked, as much of his scoring came from the perimeter rather than him slashing and drawing contact underneath, and obviously, Boston would love to turn LeBron into a jump shooter. However, the C's have to make sure to close out on the Cavaliers' outside shooters, as James can easily dish the ball back out to the likes of Williams, Parker, West, etc. if the lane gets clogged.

The main advantage Boston has over Cleveland in this series is the point guard matchup; Williams cannot handle Rondo; plain and simple. Rondo is far too quick and can easily burn Williams off the dribble every time down the floor. The key is whether or not Rondo is making his shots, as he missed a number of "gimmes" against the Heat. On that same token, though, if he is not able to put the ball in the hoop, he can still force the Cavs' defense to collapse on him, either opening up Garnett for 18-footers or Allen or Pierce behind the three-point line. One must wonder if this will also play a factor in Williams' offense, as he is going to be awfully gassed from chasing Rondo around the floor all series long.

That brings me to Wallace, the man whom Garnett, Pierce, and Allen so aggressively recruited in the off-season so he could be a huge part of a potential championship team. Well, things haven't necessarily worked out as planned, as Wallace has not really contributed anything worthwhile all year long. You then wondered whether or not he was saving it for the playoffs, too, but then you saw the way he performed against Miami, and you realize that you were probably wrong for even thinking that.

However, I still think it is too early to throw in the towel on 'Sheed. Let's remember that this is a guy who has championship experience, a guy who has defended Shaq multiple times in past postseasons and has also seen plenty of James in the playoffs, as well. His veteran savvy could play an enormous part in this series, and I would not be the least bit surprised to see him have a couple of vintage-Wallace games where he dominates in the low post, knocks down some big treys, and is very sharp defensively. Let's face it; 'Sheed signed with Boston for moments like this. If he has anything left in the tank (and I think he still does), we will see it come game one.

Another player to watch for the Celtics is Robinson. Acquired from the Knicks in a midseason trade that sent fan-favorite Eddie House packing, Robinson has not lived up to expectations in green, quickly falling out of favor with Doc Rivers and dropping out of the rotation entirely. However, Rivers would be wise to give Little Nate a shot in this series. Much like Rondo can use his quickness to routinely abuse Williams, Robinson can do the same. When he is on his game, Robinson is a very explosive player capable of scoring in bursts and giving his squad an enormous lift. If he can come in and give Boston some quality minutes off the bench, Cleveland may be in for a world of hurt.

You might think that, for the Cavaliers, this series rests solely on James, but that is very false, as Cleveland's success will ultimately depend on how well it shoots from the perimeter. Obviously, James will be attacking the rim with reckless abandon, which will continually force the Celtic defense to collapse into the paint, leaving shooters like Williams, Parker, and West open. If those guys are able to consistently knock down their outside shots, Boston will be in trouble.

The anticipation for this playoff meeting between these two squads has been building ever since the Celtics' 117-113 Easter Sunday victory over the Cavaliers. Boston led by as much as 22, but Cleveland staged a furious rally in the fourth quarter to take the lead. The Celtics then regrouped, as Allen hit a gigantic three-pointer to but his team up by four with under a minute to go, and James missed two of four free throws down the stretch.

James also had an opportunity to tie the game down by two with under 10 seconds left, but instead hoisted up an ill-advised three on a fast break that missed badly, prompting Tony Allen to say, "I stopped you." This then escalated into James entering Boston's huddle during the ensuing timeout. Garnett then hit two free throws to ice the game, and he could be seen jawing with James, who was attempting to psyche K.G. out at the line earlier. After the game, James said, "We don't like them, and they don't like us.," stating that the NBA needed a rivalry like this again. Ever since that day, this seemingly inevitable series has been gaining more and more steam, and now, we'll finally get to see it.

Prediction: Celtics in six.

Like it or not, Lakers are in trouble

Last season, the short-handed Houston Rockets took the eventual defending champion Los Angeles Lakers to seven games in the conference semi-finals, smacking the Lakers around in two of their three wins. Looking at the two rosters, one would figure that Houston had absolutely no business winning more than a game against Los Angeles, never mind three.

The Rockets were without Tracy McGrady for the entire series and without Yao Ming in games four through seven, leaving them with a starting lineup consisting of Chuck Hayes, Luis Scola, Ron Artest (who is now a Laker, ironically enough), Shane Battier, and Aaron Brooks to deal with the likes of Kobe Bryant, Pau Gasol, Lamar Odom, Andrew Bynum, and the rest of the juggernaut Lakers. Yet, Houston still managed to give Los Angeles a fight for its life, prompting questions of whether or not the Lakers truly had the heart and desire to win an NBA championship.

Well, several weeks later, Los Angeles obliterated any notion that it was not ready to win it all, beating the Orlando Magic in five games to win the NBA Finals. However, that was last season; this is this season, and the Lakers find themselves in a fairly similar position; locked in a dogfight with a team that many (myself not included) predicted L.A. would conquer with relative ease: the Oklahoma City Thunder. This time around, though, it's the first round of the playoffs.

The Lakers won the first two games of this series at home, although not in overly impressive fashion. It seems pretty clear that Bryant's injured finger is still a signficiant issue, as the former MVP shot a combined 18-of-47 from the floor in those two contests, good for 38%. This led to some criticism from coach Phil Jackson, as he told Bryant to either "shoot better or shoot less." Well, Kobe didn't exactly oblige in game three, going 10-of-29 in a 101-96 loss at Oklahoma City.

Then came game four. The crowd at Ford Center was just as loud as it was in game three, and the Thunder were as determined as ever to send the series back to California tied 2-2, which they did, annihilating Los Angeles 110-89 in a game that wasn't even that close. From the get-go, Oklahoma City dominated L.A., jumping out to a 29-17 lead after a quarter which saw Kevin Durant throw down two vicious tomahawk jams, one coming off of a nasty crossover that left Artest confuzzled.

Astonishingly, Bryant did not attempt one shot the entire first quarter. Not one. As I witnessed this, I immediately flashed back to the 2006 postseason, when Bryant, to spite Jackson, was essentially uninvolved in the Laker offense in a blowout game seven loss to the Phoenix Suns. Since then, Kobe has matured, finally winning a title without the aid of Shaquille O'Neal and developing into a consummate team leader (or so we thought). Could this first 12 minutes really have been the beginning of Bryant pulling another '06 on Jackson and Los Angeles?

Well, in the case of the Thunder, the onslaught continued in the second period, as their offensive efficiency did not cease and they began to not only get production from Durant and Russell Westbrook, but from bench players James Harden (who converted a four-point play) and Serge Ibaka. Bryant's first shot attempt of the game came at the 9:06 mark of the quarter, a successful three-pointer that would end up being one of his only three field goals in the first half (Bryant had eight points).

Going into halftime, Oklahoma City led 55-42, and the Lakers could not find any kind of rhythm offensively, nor could they stop the Thunder at the other end. The only two Los Angeles players who put forth any kind of notable production in the first half were Gasol and Bynum, and that wasn't nearly enough, as Bryant, Odom, and Artest were all but invisible for the first 24 minutes of the game.

Things only worsened for the Lakers in the third quarter, as Oklahoma City used a 31-point period to extend its lead to 22 heading into the fourth. Bryant would take four shots during this stretch, knocking down two of them. Those would be the final field goal attempts Kobe would take for the game, as, with things basically out of reach for Los Angeles entering the fourth, he would leave the bench and head to the locker room to get treatment for his assortment of nagging injuries (finger, knee, ankle). Bryant's final statline? 12 points off of 5-of-10 shooting, going 1-of-2 from the free throw line. That is clearly not a typical Kobe Bryant night.

So, the question must now be thrown about: was Bryant really just trying to get his teammates involved early, as Jackson stated after the game, or was he letting his ego take control, essentially saying: "You don't want me to shoot? Fine; now watch what happens when I don't." It is pretty sad that this even has to be brought up, but based on Bryant's history, it is a fair argument to quibble over.

Don't get me wrong; I am not solely blaming this loss on Kobe; that is hardly the case. Usually, no matter how poorly a team plays, you can point out some positives or say, "you know what, so-and-so had a solid game," but I can't even do that after this nightmarish game four for the Lakers. Yes, Gasol and Bynum had nice first halves, but they went A.W.O.L. when the ship started to sink. Artest was absolutely awful, finishing 2-of-9 from the floor with five points and three rebounds. Derek Fisher was routinely abused by Westbrook all night as he has been all series long, bringing into play the question of whether or not Jackson would be better off starting the quicker Jordan Farmar for the remainder of the series. Los Angeles laid a collective egg as team; there are no two-ways about it.

I still think the Lakers will win this series in six games as I originally predicted, but don't kid yourself; they are in trouble. The Thunder have just looked faster, quicker, stronger, and hungrier these past two games, and it's the latter of those four that is the most concerning. Once again, Los Angeles' will and desire is being catechized. The Lakers let Oklahoma City run all over them for a good portion of game three and all 48 minutes of game four, and whether or not that is because the Thunder are just too athletic and exuberant for Los Angeles or because the Lakers just don't care right now will be answered after game five.

Like it or not, game five is an absolute must-win for L.A. The Lakers cannot go back to Oklahoma City down 3-2 and expect to force a game seven. I am not saying they can't; I'm just saying that they have to take care of business now before they dig themselves a hole that may be too deep to climb out of. History also doesn't lie, as in series' that are tied at two games apiece, the winner of game five goes on to win the series 83% of the time. Also, in the case of Los Angeles, when it takes game five when tied 2-2 in a playoff series, it is 17-0 in those series'.

What kind of adjustments will the Lakers need to make to win this series? Well, first of all, Bryant cannot just take the night off offensively. I'm not saying that he should jack up 30 shots with complete disregard for the fact that he has four teammates on the floor, but that when he has an opportunity to attack the basket and when things look like they may be slipping away for Los Angeles, he has to take charge.

Also, Artest needs to wake up offensively. Yes, the Lakers did bring him in primarily for his defense so he could deal with players such as Durant in the postseason, but he needs to produce some kind of offense. He is currently 12-of-40 from the floor in this series; that's 30%. Oh, and of those 40 shots, 23 of them have been three-pointers, and of those 23, he has only converted three (13%). Artest is listed at 260 lbs. He should not be spending his time behind the three-point line, especially considering he was never a great outside shooter to begin with. To put it plainly, he needs to get going.

Finally, Los Angeles needs to find a way to slow down Westbrook, and if that means benching Fisher in favor of Farmar for the rest of the series, then so be it. Fisher may hit some big shots, but that is not worth watching him get burnt every time down the floor by the much younger and much quicker Westbrook. We've already seen this movie before; last year, Houston's Brooks made Fisher look foolish all series long. Two years ago, Boston's Rajon Rondo demolished Fisher in the Finals. Jackson needs to make an adjustment here immediataely.

Taking all things into consideration, the Lakers' experience and overall talent should (notice that I said should) be enough to get them over the hump in this series. However, they need to start now, meaning the opening tip of game five. If they don't, they may just find themselves in the position of being on the raw end of arguably the biggest playoff upset in NBA history.

Holliday talking to multiple teams; Olivo to COL?

• According to Jon Heyman of Sports Illustrated, Matt Holliday rejected a proposal from the Cardinals that was believed to be six years and over $100 million sometime during the past couple of weeks. Heyman also states that Holliday is in conversations with "multiple teams." Who could these mystery teams be? Being that the Mets just signed Jason Bay, you can count them out. The Yankees have been adamant in saying that they are not pursuing the 29-year old outfielder, although the Yanks have been known to throw up smokescreens. The Giants are another possibility, although whether or not they want to offer up a big contract is in question. Maybe the Red Sox or the Angels have jumped in? Despite everything, St. Louis is optimistic that it will re-sign Holliday. We'll soon find out.
• Miguel Olivo is very close to signing with the Rockies, which squelches any chance of Yorvit Torrealba returning to Colorado in 2010. The deal for Olivo would be for one year with a club option.
  
• Seattle is still in the market for a power hitter, presumably a first baseman. Adam LaRoche is a possibility, as is Mike Jacobs, who was recently non-tendered by Kansas City.
  
• The Diamondbacks have signed Braves' castoff Kelly Johnson to a one-year, $2.35 million deal. Johnson, who was non-tendered by Atlanta, is a natural second baseman, but can also play left field. Injuries derailed the 28-year old in 2009, as he lost his starting job to Martin Prado and posted a paltry .224/.303/.692 line as he dealt with wrist tendinits. Johnson has been a productive hitter in the past, however, particularly in 2007 when he put up a .276/.375/.832 line.
• Reds' assistant GM Bob Miller says that Jonny Gomes, whom Cincinnati non-tendered, will explore the free agent market. Gomes had a solid season at the plate in '09, compiling a line of .267/.338/.879, but his defense leaves much to be desired, as the 29-year old outfielder posted a -10.2 UZR.
• Oakland has re-signed Justin Duchscherer to a one-year deal worth a base salary of $2 million (there is also $3.5 million in incentives for games started and innings pitched). The 32-year old right-hander missed the entire 2009 season due to elbow surgery and depression, but he was fantastic in 2008, posting a 2.54 ERA and .210 BAA over 141.2 innings.
• One day after the Giants hauled in Mark DeRosa, they re-signed Juan Uribe. The versatile Uribe, 30, will likely serve as a super-utility man for San Francisco. In '09, he played second base, shortstop, and third base.
• The Dodgers are going after Joel Pineiro, as are the Angels and Mets. Los Angeles could certainly use another starting pitcher, as their rotation after Clayton Kershaw and Chad Billingsley is full of question marks.
• The Marlins and Athletics are both in the thick of the Aroldis Chapman sweepstakes. Florida made Chapman an offer a couple of weeks ago. The Red Sox also tendered the 20-year old Cuban phenom an offer.
• Boston remains very interested in Adrian Beltre. Oakland is another potential suitor for the slick-fielding third baseman.

Yankees ask about Zambrano; Mets frustrated

• In the latest bit of news about the Yankees' search for a starting pitcher, Mike Puma of the New York Post states that New York asked the Cubs about Carlos Zambrano, but balked at the asking price. The hot-tempered Zambrano is due to make $17.875 million in 2010, and $53.75 million total over the final three years of his contract. The 28-year old right-hander also has a $19.25 million vesting player option in 2013. One would assume that Chicago asked the Yankees for one of Philip Hughes or Joba Chamberlain plus top catching prospect Jesus Montero, as Geovany Soto, the 2008 NL Rookie of the Year, struggled mightily in 2009.
  
• Should nothing develop on the Zambrano front, the Yankees have numerous other options to turn to, although none of them are too appealing. As stated yesterday, Joel Pineiro and Jason Marquis are potential targets in free agency, but Pineiro is looking for a four-year deal and Marquis probably would not be much of an upgrade over Chad Gaudin. The Braves are rumored to be shopping Derek Lowe, but being that he has $45 million due over the final three years of his contract, it seems unlikely that New York would pursue him. Another possibility is Aaron Harang, who is due $25.25 million over the next two years but comes with a $2 million buyout option in 2011.
  
• The Mets are getting tired of waiting for Jason Bay and Bengie Molina to make their decisions, according to Bart Hubbuch of the New York Post. New York recently offered Bay a four-year deal worth somewhere in the neighborhood of $65 million, but Bay is said to be looking for five years. The Mets offered Molina two years and $10 million, which is a far cry from the three-year, $20 million contract he is searching for. Should neither player come down on their demands relatively soon, New York will have to look elsewhere. As far as catchers go, the Mets have also been linked to Yorvit Torrealba.
  
• Texas has signed reliever Darren Oliver to a one-year deal worth a guaranteed $3.5 million. The contract comes with a 2011 vesting option, however, that could push the total amount to $6.5 million.
  
• The Marlins made a small signing today, inking infielder Danny Richar to a minor-league contract. Florida may view the left-handed hitting Richar as a potential replacement for pinch-hitting extraordinaire Ross Gload, who recently departed for Philadelphia via free agency.
  

Marlins make offer to Chapman; Bay limited

• In what might be one of the bigger surprises of the off-season thus far, the Marlins have made 21-year old Cuban phenom Aroldis Chapman a five-year, $13 million offer. However, the Red Sox have already offered the young hurler a multi-year deal worth $15.5 million, so unless Chapman strongly desires to play in a Cuban market like Miami, the Marlins' chances of actually landing him appear slim at this point.
• Jason Bay only has one option right now, and much to his chagrin, it is the Mets. Clearly, Bay would prefer not to sign with New York, as he and his agent Joe Urbon turned around and asked Boston to revisit negotiations. Unfortunately for Bay, due to the fact that the Red Sox have already inked Mike Cameron, their interest level in the left-fielder is minimal. Bill Madden of the New York Daily News suggests that Bay sees the Mets as "no better than a third-place club," even with him in the lineup. Unless a team like Seattle, or perhaps even the Yankees, throws its hat into the bidding at the last second, Bay appears destined to ink a contract with the Mets.
  
• Now that the Mike Lowell-to-Texas trade is off, the Rangers will have to look elsewhere for a bat. Texas is reportedly interested in the likes of Vladimir Guerrero and Jermaine Dye, and Jim Thome remains another possibility. Based on that, it seems like the Rangers are scouring the market for a DH.
• Coco Crisp is close to signing a one-year, $5 million deal with Oakland. The 30-year old outfielder posted a .228/.336/.714 line over 180 at-bats with Kansas City in '09.
• Much like Bay, Johnny Damon's options are very, very limited. As a matter of fact, he may not even have the luxury of having a single potential suitor at this point. Ken Davidoff of Newsday names the Braves, Rays, Cubs, and Mets as possibilities, but notes that each of those squads remain long shots. Taking everything into consideration, Damon's most realistic suitor may still be the Yankees if he is willing to come down significantly on his price-tag. Before the Yanks reached an agreement with Nick Johnson, Damon lowered his demands to two years, $20 million. That still wasn't low enough for the Bronx Bombers, who are thinking more along the lines of a two-year, $14 million contract. At this point, that might be Damon's best, and only, bet.
• The Yankees also have interest in Mark DeRosa, but, like Damon, his asking price is far too high for their liking. I actually think there is more of a chance that New York brings Damon back than it signs DeRosa.
• Even though rumors abound about a possible Adrian Gonzalez-to-Boston deal, it doesn't appear likely, according to ESPN's Jayson Stark. The Padres really do not have to deal Gonzalez, considering he is only owed $4.5 million this season and has a $5.5 million club buyout option in 2011. He is, without a doubt, one of the biggest bargains in baseball. That said, you would have to think that San Diego would at least contemplate the idea of trading A-Gon should the Red Sox come up with the right package (Jacoby Ellsbury, Casey Kelly, and Jake Westmoreland would be immediate targets for the Padres).
• The Cubs are looking for an outfielder, and they are rumored to have strong interest in Marlon Byrd, with Scott Podsednik representing another possibility. Chicago could also look to swing a deal with the Yankees for one of Melky Cabrera and Brett Gardner now that New York does not have a need for both of them due to the fact that it landed Curtis Granderson. The Cubs have also had talks with free agent reliever Matt Capps, as Chicago is in serious need of bullpen help.
  
• If you're wondering why the catching market seems a bit slow at the moment, look no further than Bengie Molina and his demand for a three-year, $20 million contract, according to Jon Paul Morosi of FOXSports.com, who spoke to a "person in the industry" with knowledge of the situation. The Mets have been rumored to be Molina's top potential suitor, but they have balked at his high price-tag (wouldn't you?). Not that the list of free agent catchers, which, outside of Molina, includes his brother Jose, Yorvit Torrealba, and Rod Barajas, is all that impressive, but there are still plenty of teams in need of second-string backstops.

MLB Rumors: 11/14

• The Tigers are shopping Curtis Granderson, with the Cubs, Angels, and Yankees considered possible destinations for the 28-year old outfielder. Granderson had a disappointing '09 season, putting up a .249/.327/.780 line. Even more concerning were his numbers against lefties (.183/.245/.484). Detroit has also made Edwin Jackson available for trade. The Brewers have already expressed interest.
  
• Both the Orioles and Giants have serious interest in the Marlins' Dan Uggla. However, both teams would want Uggla to play third base, and Uggla's agent made it known this week that Uggla wants to remain at second. The Red Sox have also expressed interest and might make a play for him in the event that they do not re-sign Jason Bay. Boston would want Uggla to play left field.
• It might be another quiet off-season for the Mets in terms of landing big names. They will most likely poke their heads in on John Lackey, but they are concerned about his injury history and therefore are reluctant to hand him a big contract (perhaps this is based on the contract New York gave to Oliver Perez last off-season). Matt Holliday will likely be too expensive for Omar Minaya and company, as well. Instead, the Mets might look to cheaper free agents such as Joel Pineiro, Randy Wolf, and Bengie Molina. They have also not ruled out the possibility of bringing Carlos Delgado back.
  
• Speaking of Lackey, Boston met with his agent and has serious interest in the 31-year old right-hander. The Yankees and Angels are also legitimate contenders for his services.
  
• Mike Cameron is drawing some interest from around the league, and many feel that, given his outstanding defensive ability, he will bring better bang for the buck than Bay. The Yankees could be a possible destination with their outfield situation in a bit of a flux.
• Washington has expressed interest in both Mark DeRosa and Mike Gonzalez. Being that the Nationals had the worst bullpen in baseball last season, Gonzalez would certainly be a welcome addition.
• The Brewers are looking for pitching. They are looking at Detroit's Jackson (as stated earlier) and Javier Vazquez and Derek Lowe of Atlanta.
• The Braves might be forced to trade one of Vazquez or Lowe for financial reasons. Milwaukee and the Dodgers have both inquired on Vazquez, and the Yankees could be a possibilty for Lowe should they fail to sign Lackey.